<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for British Sovereign Gold Coin Shop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://britishsovereign.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://britishsovereign.com</link>
	<description>Beautiful gold sovereign coins for sale</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:33:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Obama Is Antisemitic Like Detractors Claim, Why Did He Choose the King Solomon Solution for Peace in Israel? by BMCR</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>BMCR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/#comment-521</guid>
		<description>Well, from what I can tell, most of Obama&#039;s detractors, including those who think his policies will be bad for Israel, do not label him anti semitic. It seems to me that you are attempting to disparage his detractors by making them appear more radical than most of them actually are.

Nevertheless, the Solomon analogy is an interesting one considering that it is NOT really apt.
In the Bible, the whole point was that Solomon was NOT going to kill the baby, rather his threatening to do so was to &quot;smoke out&quot; who the real mother was. (i.e. the real mother would protest while the fake mother would acquiesce to it.)
In this case, he is actually suggesting that the &quot;baby&quot; actually be cut in half, not as a test but as a reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, from what I can tell, most of Obama&#8217;s detractors, including those who think his policies will be bad for Israel, do not label him anti semitic. It seems to me that you are attempting to disparage his detractors by making them appear more radical than most of them actually are.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the Solomon analogy is an interesting one considering that it is NOT really apt.<br />
In the Bible, the whole point was that Solomon was NOT going to kill the baby, rather his threatening to do so was to &#8220;smoke out&#8221; who the real mother was. (i.e. the real mother would protest while the fake mother would acquiesce to it.)<br />
In this case, he is actually suggesting that the &#8220;baby&#8221; actually be cut in half, not as a test but as a reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Obama Is Antisemitic Like Detractors Claim, Why Did He Choose the King Solomon Solution for Peace in Israel? by 老山羊</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>老山羊</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Obama is antisemitic using any of his past words in a attempt to prove other wise is pointless. Obama has proven to many times what he says means nothing, his actions are almost always opposite his words</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is antisemitic using any of his past words in a attempt to prove other wise is pointless. Obama has proven to many times what he says means nothing, his actions are almost always opposite his words</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Obama Is Antisemitic Like Detractors Claim, Why Did He Choose the King Solomon Solution for Peace in Israel? by Will</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>The land was taken from the  Arabs ie Palestinians to begin with. In 1948. Let me  re- emphasize Taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The land was taken from the  Arabs ie Palestinians to begin with. In 1948. Let me  re- emphasize Taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Obama Is Antisemitic Like Detractors Claim, Why Did He Choose the King Solomon Solution for Peace in Israel? by consrgreat</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>consrgreat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Right by taking their land away...so would it means he loves you if he takes your welfare away?  and Obama has no problem letting kids die anyway...like the &quot;failed abortions&quot; left to starve to death in a closet....WHAT A GUY...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right by taking their land away&#8230;so would it means he loves you if he takes your welfare away?  and Obama has no problem letting kids die anyway&#8230;like the &#8220;failed abortions&#8221; left to starve to death in a closet&#8230;.WHAT A GUY&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Obama Is Antisemitic Like Detractors Claim, Why Did He Choose the King Solomon Solution for Peace in Israel? by justgoodfolk</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>justgoodfolk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/#comment-517</guid>
		<description>No. He&#039;s actually more pro Israel than Bush was, the polar opposite.

Nader explained this very well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. He&#8217;s actually more pro Israel than Bush was, the polar opposite.</p>
<p>Nader explained this very well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Obama Is Antisemitic Like Detractors Claim, Why Did He Choose the King Solomon Solution for Peace in Israel? by Paul Grass</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Grass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s actions are so , so schizophrenic and contradicting in nature its is difficult at times to fathom, he will say one thing yet do another. He also is not making friends or influencing the right people in the middle East, he has single handedly pissed off every Arab and Jew alike in the region by his actions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s actions are so , so schizophrenic and contradicting in nature its is difficult at times to fathom, he will say one thing yet do another. He also is not making friends or influencing the right people in the middle East, he has single handedly pissed off every Arab and Jew alike in the region by his actions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Obama Is Antisemitic Like Detractors Claim, Why Did He Choose the King Solomon Solution for Peace in Israel? by eyescrazychris</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>eyescrazychris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/if-obama-is-antisemitic-like-detractors-claim-why-did-he-choose-the-king-solomon-solution-for-peace-in-israel/#comment-515</guid>
		<description>He really wants them fight it out so he can get a Nobel Peace prize with oak leaf clusters , like Carter did</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He really wants them fight it out so he can get a Nobel Peace prize with oak leaf clusters , like Carter did</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is It Fair to Say That if McCain / Palin Were Sitting Pres and VP, Osama Would Still Be at Large? by michael rossano</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/is-it-fair-to-say-that-if-mccain-palin-were-sitting-pres-and-vp-osama-would-still-be-at-large/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>michael rossano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/is-it-fair-to-say-that-if-mccain-palin-were-sitting-pres-and-vp-osama-would-still-be-at-large/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Positively...and I agree wth all of Ur comments...wow_U certainly did Ur homework! Great question and Exceptional remarks...thanks! How could I possibly add to that...You gave Me a lesson! Good and interesting work Friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Positively&#8230;and I agree wth all of Ur comments&#8230;wow_U certainly did Ur homework! Great question and Exceptional remarks&#8230;thanks! How could I possibly add to that&#8230;You gave Me a lesson! Good and interesting work Friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is It Fair to Say That if McCain / Palin Were Sitting Pres and VP, Osama Would Still Be at Large? by sweendog93</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/is-it-fair-to-say-that-if-mccain-palin-were-sitting-pres-and-vp-osama-would-still-be-at-large/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>sweendog93</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/is-it-fair-to-say-that-if-mccain-palin-were-sitting-pres-and-vp-osama-would-still-be-at-large/#comment-513</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a liberal Democrat but that&#039;s ridiculous.  McCain (or Palin if he had died by now) would have told the CIA and NSA to continue to make bin Laden a top priority just as Obama did.  I&#039;ll refute your points as best I can:

- CIA now says he was a key player, and was actively working on another attack 
How would a McCain presidency change this?

-Republicans Bush, and Senator McCain both went on the record about why they would not send troops into Pakistan. 
Telling a key ally in a precarious situation that you&#039;ll invade their sovereignty on an as-needed basis isn&#039;t going to make them any more helpful to you.

-Senator McCain was Asked by Larry King during the 2008 Campaign &quot; If you knew where Bin Laden was in Pakistan, would you send troops in after him&quot; McCains response &quot; I&#039;m not gonna go there, Pakistan is a sovereign nation&quot;
See above Burning American flags in the streets of an ally in the &quot;war on terror&quot; with a weak central government isn&#039;t going to do us much good.

-The exact same question was asked to Then Senator Barack Obama, In the 3rd debate who simply answered &quot; yes&quot; This was followed by a verbal attack from McCain , who called him &quot; Naive&quot; 
See above, and if Republicans were willing to p1$$ on the 4th Amendment in the name of national security do you think they&#039;d have a problem with a surgical strike in a semi-friendly country?  Both were trying to score political points, nothing more.

-It was the Republicans in 2008, who Restlessly attacked Senator Obama about his views on Pakistan. Bill O&#039;reilly even went as far as to make fun of him during his interview before the 2008 election about his views on Pakistan.
Pakistan the country had nothing to do with this. And &quot;restlessly&quot;?

-Fact, if we had a McCain Palin Adminstration, Osama Would still be at Large, because McCain will not invade a sovereign nation. 
I disrespectfully disagree and Am annoyed By your Random capitalizAtion.

Both Democrats and Republicans want this country to be healthy, wealthy and safe.  They just have different ideas about how to get there.  I think it&#039;s important to keep that in mind when discussing politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a liberal Democrat but that&#8217;s ridiculous.  McCain (or Palin if he had died by now) would have told the CIA and NSA to continue to make bin Laden a top priority just as Obama did.  I&#8217;ll refute your points as best I can:</p>
<p>- CIA now says he was a key player, and was actively working on another attack<br />
How would a McCain presidency change this?</p>
<p>-Republicans Bush, and Senator McCain both went on the record about why they would not send troops into Pakistan.<br />
Telling a key ally in a precarious situation that you&#8217;ll invade their sovereignty on an as-needed basis isn&#8217;t going to make them any more helpful to you.</p>
<p>-Senator McCain was Asked by Larry King during the 2008 Campaign &#8221; If you knew where Bin Laden was in Pakistan, would you send troops in after him&#8221; McCains response &#8221; I&#8217;m not gonna go there, Pakistan is a sovereign nation&#8221;<br />
See above Burning American flags in the streets of an ally in the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; with a weak central government isn&#8217;t going to do us much good.</p>
<p>-The exact same question was asked to Then Senator Barack Obama, In the 3rd debate who simply answered &#8221; yes&#8221; This was followed by a verbal attack from McCain , who called him &#8221; Naive&#8221;<br />
See above, and if Republicans were willing to p1$$ on the 4th Amendment in the name of national security do you think they&#8217;d have a problem with a surgical strike in a semi-friendly country?  Both were trying to score political points, nothing more.</p>
<p>-It was the Republicans in 2008, who Restlessly attacked Senator Obama about his views on Pakistan. Bill O&#8217;reilly even went as far as to make fun of him during his interview before the 2008 election about his views on Pakistan.<br />
Pakistan the country had nothing to do with this. And &#8220;restlessly&#8221;?</p>
<p>-Fact, if we had a McCain Palin Adminstration, Osama Would still be at Large, because McCain will not invade a sovereign nation.<br />
I disrespectfully disagree and Am annoyed By your Random capitalizAtion.</p>
<p>Both Democrats and Republicans want this country to be healthy, wealthy and safe.  They just have different ideas about how to get there.  I think it&#8217;s important to keep that in mind when discussing politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is It Fair to Say That if McCain / Palin Were Sitting Pres and VP, Osama Would Still Be at Large? by Liz</title>
		<link>http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/is-it-fair-to-say-that-if-mccain-palin-were-sitting-pres-and-vp-osama-would-still-be-at-large/comment-page-1/#comment-512</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://britishsovereign.com/british-gold-sovereign-faq/is-it-fair-to-say-that-if-mccain-palin-were-sitting-pres-and-vp-osama-would-still-be-at-large/#comment-512</guid>
		<description>Palin caused Obama to get elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin caused Obama to get elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

